rustc_borrowck/polonius/loan_liveness.rs
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307
use std::collections::{BTreeMap, BTreeSet};
use rustc_data_structures::fx::{FxHashMap, FxHashSet, FxIndexSet};
use rustc_middle::mir::visit::Visitor;
use rustc_middle::mir::{
Body, Local, Location, Place, Rvalue, Statement, StatementKind, Terminator, TerminatorKind,
};
use rustc_middle::ty::{RegionVid, TyCtxt};
use rustc_mir_dataflow::points::PointIndex;
use super::{LiveLoans, LocalizedOutlivesConstraintSet};
use crate::constraints::OutlivesConstraint;
use crate::dataflow::BorrowIndex;
use crate::region_infer::values::LivenessValues;
use crate::type_check::Locations;
use crate::{BorrowSet, PlaceConflictBias, places_conflict};
/// Compute loan reachability, stop at kills, and trace loan liveness throughout the CFG, by
/// traversing the full graph of constraints that combines:
/// - the localized constraints (the physical edges),
/// - with the constraints that hold at all points (the logical edges).
pub(super) fn compute_loan_liveness<'tcx>(
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
body: &Body<'tcx>,
liveness: &LivenessValues,
outlives_constraints: impl Iterator<Item = OutlivesConstraint<'tcx>>,
borrow_set: &BorrowSet<'tcx>,
localized_outlives_constraints: &LocalizedOutlivesConstraintSet,
) -> LiveLoans {
let mut live_loans = LiveLoans::new(borrow_set.len());
// FIXME: it may be preferable for kills to be encoded in the edges themselves, to simplify and
// likely make traversal (and constraint generation) more efficient. We also display kills on
// edges when visualizing the constraint graph anyways.
let kills = collect_kills(body, tcx, borrow_set);
// Create the full graph with the physical edges we've localized earlier, and the logical edges
// of constraints that hold at all points.
let logical_constraints =
outlives_constraints.filter(|c| matches!(c.locations, Locations::All(_)));
let graph = LocalizedConstraintGraph::new(&localized_outlives_constraints, logical_constraints);
let mut visited = FxHashSet::default();
let mut stack = Vec::new();
// Compute reachability per loan by traversing each loan's subgraph starting from where it is
// introduced.
for (loan_idx, loan) in borrow_set.iter_enumerated() {
visited.clear();
stack.clear();
let start_node = LocalizedNode {
region: loan.region,
point: liveness.point_from_location(loan.reserve_location),
};
stack.push(start_node);
while let Some(node) = stack.pop() {
if !visited.insert(node) {
continue;
}
// Record the loan as being live on entry to this point.
live_loans.insert(node.point, loan_idx);
// Here, we have a conundrum. There's currently a weakness in our theory, in that
// we're using a single notion of reachability to represent what used to be _two_
// different transitive closures. It didn't seem impactful when coming up with the
// single-graph and reachability through space (regions) + time (CFG) concepts, but in
// practice the combination of time-traveling with kills is more impactful than
// initially anticipated.
//
// Kills should prevent a loan from reaching its successor points in the CFG, but not
// while time-traveling: we're not actually at that CFG point, but looking for
// predecessor regions that contain the loan. One of the two TCs we had pushed the
// transitive subset edges to each point instead of having backward edges, and the
// problem didn't exist before. In the abstract, naive reachability is not enough to
// model this, we'd need a slightly different solution. For example, maybe with a
// two-step traversal:
// - at each point we first traverse the subgraph (and possibly time-travel) looking for
// exit nodes while ignoring kills,
// - and then when we're back at the current point, we continue normally.
//
// Another (less annoying) subtlety is that kills and the loan use-map are
// flow-insensitive. Kills can actually appear in places before a loan is introduced, or
// at a location that is actually unreachable in the CFG from the introduction point,
// and these can also be encountered during time-traveling.
//
// The simplest change that made sense to "fix" the issues above is taking into
// account kills that are:
// - reachable from the introduction point
// - encountered during forward traversal. Note that this is not transitive like the
// two-step traversal described above: only kills encountered on exit via a backward
// edge are ignored.
//
// In our test suite, there are a couple of cases where kills are encountered while
// time-traveling, however as far as we can tell, always in cases where they would be
// unreachable. We have reason to believe that this is a property of the single-graph
// approach (but haven't proved it yet):
// - reachable kills while time-traveling would also be encountered via regular
// traversal
// - it makes _some_ sense to ignore unreachable kills, but subtleties around dead code
// in general need to be better thought through (like they were for NLLs).
// - ignoring kills is a conservative approximation: the loan is still live and could
// cause false positive errors at another place access. Soundness issues in this
// domain should look more like the absence of reachability instead.
//
// This is enough in practice to pass tests, and therefore is what we have implemented
// for now.
//
// FIXME: all of the above. Analyze potential unsoundness, possibly in concert with a
// borrowck implementation in a-mir-formality, fuzzing, or manually crafting
// counter-examples.
// Continuing traversal will depend on whether the loan is killed at this point, and
// whether we're time-traveling.
let current_location = liveness.location_from_point(node.point);
let is_loan_killed =
kills.get(¤t_location).is_some_and(|kills| kills.contains(&loan_idx));
for succ in graph.outgoing_edges(node) {
// If the loan is killed at this point, it is killed _on exit_. But only during
// forward traversal.
if is_loan_killed {
let destination = liveness.location_from_point(succ.point);
if current_location.is_predecessor_of(destination, body) {
continue;
}
}
stack.push(succ);
}
}
}
live_loans
}
/// The localized constraint graph indexes the physical and logical edges to compute a given node's
/// successors during traversal.
struct LocalizedConstraintGraph {
/// The actual, physical, edges we have recorded for a given node.
edges: FxHashMap<LocalizedNode, FxIndexSet<LocalizedNode>>,
/// The logical edges representing the outlives constraints that hold at all points in the CFG,
/// which we don't localize to avoid creating a lot of unnecessary edges in the graph. Some CFGs
/// can be big, and we don't need to create such a physical edge for every point in the CFG.
logical_edges: FxHashMap<RegionVid, FxIndexSet<RegionVid>>,
}
/// A node in the graph to be traversed, one of the two vertices of a localized outlives constraint.
#[derive(Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Hash, Debug)]
struct LocalizedNode {
region: RegionVid,
point: PointIndex,
}
impl LocalizedConstraintGraph {
/// Traverses the constraints and returns the indexed graph of edges per node.
fn new<'tcx>(
constraints: &LocalizedOutlivesConstraintSet,
logical_constraints: impl Iterator<Item = OutlivesConstraint<'tcx>>,
) -> Self {
let mut edges: FxHashMap<_, FxIndexSet<_>> = FxHashMap::default();
for constraint in &constraints.outlives {
let source = LocalizedNode { region: constraint.source, point: constraint.from };
let target = LocalizedNode { region: constraint.target, point: constraint.to };
edges.entry(source).or_default().insert(target);
}
let mut logical_edges: FxHashMap<_, FxIndexSet<_>> = FxHashMap::default();
for constraint in logical_constraints {
logical_edges.entry(constraint.sup).or_default().insert(constraint.sub);
}
LocalizedConstraintGraph { edges, logical_edges }
}
/// Returns the outgoing edges of a given node, not its transitive closure.
fn outgoing_edges(&self, node: LocalizedNode) -> impl Iterator<Item = LocalizedNode> + use<'_> {
// The outgoing edges are:
// - the physical edges present at this node,
// - the materialized logical edges that exist virtually at all points for this node's
// region, localized at this point.
let physical_edges =
self.edges.get(&node).into_iter().flat_map(|targets| targets.iter().copied());
let materialized_edges =
self.logical_edges.get(&node.region).into_iter().flat_map(move |targets| {
targets
.iter()
.copied()
.map(move |target| LocalizedNode { point: node.point, region: target })
});
physical_edges.chain(materialized_edges)
}
}
/// Traverses the MIR and collects kills.
fn collect_kills<'tcx>(
body: &Body<'tcx>,
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
borrow_set: &BorrowSet<'tcx>,
) -> BTreeMap<Location, BTreeSet<BorrowIndex>> {
let mut collector = KillsCollector { borrow_set, tcx, body, kills: BTreeMap::default() };
for (block, data) in body.basic_blocks.iter_enumerated() {
collector.visit_basic_block_data(block, data);
}
collector.kills
}
struct KillsCollector<'a, 'tcx> {
body: &'a Body<'tcx>,
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
borrow_set: &'a BorrowSet<'tcx>,
/// The set of loans killed at each location.
kills: BTreeMap<Location, BTreeSet<BorrowIndex>>,
}
// This visitor has a similar structure to the `Borrows` dataflow computation with respect to kills,
// and the datalog polonius fact generation for the `loan_killed_at` relation.
impl<'tcx> KillsCollector<'_, 'tcx> {
/// Records the borrows on the specified place as `killed`. For example, when assigning to a
/// local, or on a call's return destination.
fn record_killed_borrows_for_place(&mut self, place: Place<'tcx>, location: Location) {
// For the reasons described in graph traversal, we also filter out kills
// unreachable from the loan's introduction point, as they would stop traversal when
// e.g. checking for reachability in the subset graph through invariance constraints
// higher up.
let filter_unreachable_kills = |loan| {
let introduction = self.borrow_set[loan].reserve_location;
let reachable = introduction.is_predecessor_of(location, self.body);
reachable
};
let other_borrows_of_local = self
.borrow_set
.local_map
.get(&place.local)
.into_iter()
.flat_map(|bs| bs.iter())
.copied();
// If the borrowed place is a local with no projections, all other borrows of this
// local must conflict. This is purely an optimization so we don't have to call
// `places_conflict` for every borrow.
if place.projection.is_empty() {
if !self.body.local_decls[place.local].is_ref_to_static() {
self.kills
.entry(location)
.or_default()
.extend(other_borrows_of_local.filter(|&loan| filter_unreachable_kills(loan)));
}
return;
}
// By passing `PlaceConflictBias::NoOverlap`, we conservatively assume that any given
// pair of array indices are not equal, so that when `places_conflict` returns true, we
// will be assured that two places being compared definitely denotes the same sets of
// locations.
let definitely_conflicting_borrows = other_borrows_of_local
.filter(|&i| {
places_conflict(
self.tcx,
self.body,
self.borrow_set[i].borrowed_place,
place,
PlaceConflictBias::NoOverlap,
)
})
.filter(|&loan| filter_unreachable_kills(loan));
self.kills.entry(location).or_default().extend(definitely_conflicting_borrows);
}
/// Records the borrows on the specified local as `killed`.
fn record_killed_borrows_for_local(&mut self, local: Local, location: Location) {
if let Some(borrow_indices) = self.borrow_set.local_map.get(&local) {
self.kills.entry(location).or_default().extend(borrow_indices.iter());
}
}
}
impl<'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for KillsCollector<'_, 'tcx> {
fn visit_statement(&mut self, statement: &Statement<'tcx>, location: Location) {
// Make sure there are no remaining borrows for locals that have gone out of scope.
if let StatementKind::StorageDead(local) = statement.kind {
self.record_killed_borrows_for_local(local, location);
}
self.super_statement(statement, location);
}
fn visit_assign(&mut self, place: &Place<'tcx>, rvalue: &Rvalue<'tcx>, location: Location) {
// When we see `X = ...`, then kill borrows of `(*X).foo` and so forth.
self.record_killed_borrows_for_place(*place, location);
self.super_assign(place, rvalue, location);
}
fn visit_terminator(&mut self, terminator: &Terminator<'tcx>, location: Location) {
// A `Call` terminator's return value can be a local which has borrows, so we need to record
// those as killed as well.
if let TerminatorKind::Call { destination, .. } = terminator.kind {
self.record_killed_borrows_for_place(destination, location);
}
self.super_terminator(terminator, location);
}
}