1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453
//! An infrastructure to mechanically analyse proof trees.
//!
//! It is unavoidable that this representation is somewhat
//! lossy as it should hide quite a few semantically relevant things,
//! e.g. canonicalization and the order of nested goals.
//!
//! @lcnr: However, a lot of the weirdness here is not strictly necessary
//! and could be improved in the future. This is mostly good enough for
//! coherence right now and was annoying to implement, so I am leaving it
//! as is until we start using it for something else.
use rustc_ast_ir::try_visit;
use rustc_ast_ir::visit::VisitorResult;
use rustc_infer::infer::resolve::EagerResolver;
use rustc_infer::infer::{DefineOpaqueTypes, InferCtxt, InferOk};
use rustc_macros::extension;
use rustc_middle::traits::query::NoSolution;
use rustc_middle::traits::solve::{inspect, QueryResult};
use rustc_middle::traits::solve::{Certainty, Goal};
use rustc_middle::traits::ObligationCause;
use rustc_middle::ty::{TyCtxt, TypeFoldable};
use rustc_middle::{bug, ty};
use rustc_span::{Span, DUMMY_SP};
use crate::solve::eval_ctxt::canonical;
use crate::solve::{EvalCtxt, GoalEvaluationKind, GoalSource};
use crate::solve::{GenerateProofTree, InferCtxtEvalExt};
use crate::traits::ObligationCtxt;
pub struct InspectConfig {
pub max_depth: usize,
}
pub struct InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> {
infcx: &'a InferCtxt<'tcx>,
depth: usize,
orig_values: Vec<ty::GenericArg<'tcx>>,
goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
result: Result<Certainty, NoSolution>,
evaluation_kind: inspect::CanonicalGoalEvaluationKind<TyCtxt<'tcx>>,
normalizes_to_term_hack: Option<NormalizesToTermHack<'tcx>>,
source: GoalSource,
}
/// The expected term of a `NormalizesTo` goal gets replaced
/// with an unconstrained inference variable when computing
/// `NormalizesTo` goals and we return the nested goals to the
/// caller, who also equates the actual term with the expected.
///
/// This is an implementation detail of the trait solver and
/// not something we want to leak to users. We therefore
/// treat `NormalizesTo` goals as if they apply the expected
/// type at the end of each candidate.
#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
struct NormalizesToTermHack<'tcx> {
term: ty::Term<'tcx>,
unconstrained_term: ty::Term<'tcx>,
}
impl<'tcx> NormalizesToTermHack<'tcx> {
/// Relate the `term` with the new `unconstrained_term` created
/// when computing the proof tree for this `NormalizesTo` goals.
/// This handles nested obligations.
fn constrain(
self,
infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>,
span: Span,
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
) -> Result<Certainty, NoSolution> {
infcx
.at(&ObligationCause::dummy_with_span(span), param_env)
.eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, self.term, self.unconstrained_term)
.map_err(|_| NoSolution)
.and_then(|InferOk { value: (), obligations }| {
let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(infcx);
ocx.register_obligations(obligations);
let errors = ocx.select_all_or_error();
if errors.is_empty() {
Ok(Certainty::Yes)
} else if errors.iter().all(|e| !e.is_true_error()) {
Ok(Certainty::AMBIGUOUS)
} else {
Err(NoSolution)
}
})
}
}
pub struct InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx> {
goal: &'a InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx>,
kind: inspect::ProbeKind<TyCtxt<'tcx>>,
nested_goals:
Vec<(GoalSource, inspect::CanonicalState<TyCtxt<'tcx>, Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>)>,
final_state: inspect::CanonicalState<TyCtxt<'tcx>, ()>,
impl_args: Option<inspect::CanonicalState<TyCtxt<'tcx>, ty::GenericArgsRef<'tcx>>>,
result: QueryResult<'tcx>,
shallow_certainty: Certainty,
}
impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx> {
pub fn kind(&self) -> inspect::ProbeKind<TyCtxt<'tcx>> {
self.kind
}
pub fn result(&self) -> Result<Certainty, NoSolution> {
self.result.map(|c| c.value.certainty)
}
pub fn goal(&self) -> &'a InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> {
self.goal
}
/// Certainty passed into `evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response`.
///
/// If this certainty is `Yes`, then we must be confident that the candidate
/// must hold iff it's nested goals hold. This is not true if the certainty is
/// `Maybe(..)`, which suggests we forced ambiguity instead.
///
/// This is *not* the certainty of the candidate's full nested evaluation, which
/// can be accessed with [`Self::result`] instead.
pub fn shallow_certainty(&self) -> Certainty {
self.shallow_certainty
}
/// Visit all nested goals of this candidate without rolling
/// back their inference constraints. This function modifies
/// the state of the `infcx`.
pub fn visit_nested_no_probe<V: ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx>>(&self, visitor: &mut V) -> V::Result {
for goal in self.instantiate_nested_goals(visitor.span()) {
try_visit!(goal.visit_with(visitor));
}
V::Result::output()
}
/// Instantiate the nested goals for the candidate without rolling back their
/// inference constraints. This function modifies the state of the `infcx`.
///
/// See [`Self::instantiate_nested_goals_and_opt_impl_args`] if you need the impl args too.
pub fn instantiate_nested_goals(&self, span: Span) -> Vec<InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx>> {
self.instantiate_nested_goals_and_opt_impl_args(span).0
}
/// Instantiate the nested goals for the candidate without rolling back their
/// inference constraints, and optionally the args of an impl if this candidate
/// came from a `CandidateSource::Impl`. This function modifies the state of the
/// `infcx`.
#[instrument(
level = "debug",
skip_all,
fields(goal = ?self.goal.goal, nested_goals = ?self.nested_goals)
)]
pub fn instantiate_nested_goals_and_opt_impl_args(
&self,
span: Span,
) -> (Vec<InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx>>, Option<ty::GenericArgsRef<'tcx>>) {
let infcx = self.goal.infcx;
let param_env = self.goal.goal.param_env;
let mut orig_values = self.goal.orig_values.to_vec();
let instantiated_goals: Vec<_> = self
.nested_goals
.iter()
.map(|(source, goal)| {
(
*source,
canonical::instantiate_canonical_state(
infcx,
span,
param_env,
&mut orig_values,
*goal,
),
)
})
.collect();
let () = canonical::instantiate_canonical_state(
infcx,
span,
param_env,
&mut orig_values,
self.final_state,
);
let impl_args = self.impl_args.map(|impl_args| {
canonical::instantiate_canonical_state(
infcx,
span,
param_env,
&mut orig_values,
impl_args,
)
.fold_with(&mut EagerResolver::new(infcx))
});
if let Some(term_hack) = self.goal.normalizes_to_term_hack {
// FIXME: We ignore the expected term of `NormalizesTo` goals
// when computing the result of its candidates. This is
// scuffed.
let _ = term_hack.constrain(infcx, span, param_env);
}
let goals = instantiated_goals
.into_iter()
.map(|(source, goal)| match goal.predicate.kind().no_bound_vars() {
Some(ty::PredicateKind::NormalizesTo(ty::NormalizesTo { alias, term })) => {
let unconstrained_term = match term.unpack() {
ty::TermKind::Ty(_) => infcx.next_ty_var(span).into(),
ty::TermKind::Const(ct) => infcx.next_const_var(ct.ty(), span).into(),
};
let goal =
goal.with(infcx.tcx, ty::NormalizesTo { alias, term: unconstrained_term });
// We have to use a `probe` here as evaluating a `NormalizesTo` can constrain the
// expected term. This means that candidates which only fail due to nested goals
// and which normalize to a different term then the final result could ICE: when
// building their proof tree, the expected term was unconstrained, but when
// instantiating the candidate it is already constrained to the result of another
// candidate.
let proof_tree = infcx
.probe(|_| {
EvalCtxt::enter_root(infcx, GenerateProofTree::Yes, |ecx| {
ecx.evaluate_goal_raw(
GoalEvaluationKind::Root,
GoalSource::Misc,
goal,
)
})
})
.1;
InspectGoal::new(
infcx,
self.goal.depth + 1,
proof_tree.unwrap(),
Some(NormalizesToTermHack { term, unconstrained_term }),
source,
)
}
_ => {
// We're using a probe here as evaluating a goal could constrain
// inference variables by choosing one candidate. If we then recurse
// into another candidate who ends up with different inference
// constraints, we get an ICE if we already applied the constraints
// from the chosen candidate.
let proof_tree = infcx
.probe(|_| infcx.evaluate_root_goal(goal, GenerateProofTree::Yes).1)
.unwrap();
InspectGoal::new(infcx, self.goal.depth + 1, proof_tree, None, source)
}
})
.collect();
(goals, impl_args)
}
/// Visit all nested goals of this candidate, rolling back
/// all inference constraints.
pub fn visit_nested_in_probe<V: ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx>>(&self, visitor: &mut V) -> V::Result {
self.goal.infcx.probe(|_| self.visit_nested_no_probe(visitor))
}
}
impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> {
pub fn infcx(&self) -> &'a InferCtxt<'tcx> {
self.infcx
}
pub fn goal(&self) -> Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>> {
self.goal
}
pub fn result(&self) -> Result<Certainty, NoSolution> {
self.result
}
pub fn source(&self) -> GoalSource {
self.source
}
fn candidates_recur(
&'a self,
candidates: &mut Vec<InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx>>,
nested_goals: &mut Vec<(
GoalSource,
inspect::CanonicalState<TyCtxt<'tcx>, Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>,
)>,
probe: &inspect::Probe<TyCtxt<'tcx>>,
) {
let mut shallow_certainty = None;
let mut impl_args = None;
for step in &probe.steps {
match *step {
inspect::ProbeStep::AddGoal(source, goal) => nested_goals.push((source, goal)),
inspect::ProbeStep::NestedProbe(ref probe) => {
match probe.kind {
// These never assemble candidates for the goal we're trying to solve.
inspect::ProbeKind::UpcastProjectionCompatibility
| inspect::ProbeKind::ShadowedEnvProbing => continue,
inspect::ProbeKind::NormalizedSelfTyAssembly
| inspect::ProbeKind::UnsizeAssembly
| inspect::ProbeKind::Root { .. }
| inspect::ProbeKind::TryNormalizeNonRigid { .. }
| inspect::ProbeKind::TraitCandidate { .. }
| inspect::ProbeKind::OpaqueTypeStorageLookup { .. } => {
// Nested probes have to prove goals added in their parent
// but do not leak them, so we truncate the added goals
// afterwards.
let num_goals = nested_goals.len();
self.candidates_recur(candidates, nested_goals, probe);
nested_goals.truncate(num_goals);
}
}
}
inspect::ProbeStep::MakeCanonicalResponse { shallow_certainty: c } => {
assert_eq!(shallow_certainty.replace(c), None);
}
inspect::ProbeStep::RecordImplArgs { impl_args: i } => {
assert_eq!(impl_args.replace(i), None);
}
inspect::ProbeStep::EvaluateGoals(_) => (),
}
}
match probe.kind {
inspect::ProbeKind::UpcastProjectionCompatibility
| inspect::ProbeKind::ShadowedEnvProbing => bug!(),
inspect::ProbeKind::NormalizedSelfTyAssembly | inspect::ProbeKind::UnsizeAssembly => {}
// We add a candidate even for the root evaluation if there
// is only one way to prove a given goal, e.g. for `WellFormed`.
inspect::ProbeKind::Root { result }
| inspect::ProbeKind::TryNormalizeNonRigid { result }
| inspect::ProbeKind::TraitCandidate { source: _, result }
| inspect::ProbeKind::OpaqueTypeStorageLookup { result } => {
// We only add a candidate if `shallow_certainty` was set, which means
// that we ended up calling `evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response`.
if let Some(shallow_certainty) = shallow_certainty {
candidates.push(InspectCandidate {
goal: self,
kind: probe.kind,
nested_goals: nested_goals.clone(),
final_state: probe.final_state,
result,
shallow_certainty,
impl_args,
});
}
}
}
}
pub fn candidates(&'a self) -> Vec<InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx>> {
let mut candidates = vec![];
let last_eval_step = match self.evaluation_kind {
inspect::CanonicalGoalEvaluationKind::Overflow
| inspect::CanonicalGoalEvaluationKind::CycleInStack
| inspect::CanonicalGoalEvaluationKind::ProvisionalCacheHit => {
warn!("unexpected root evaluation: {:?}", self.evaluation_kind);
return vec![];
}
inspect::CanonicalGoalEvaluationKind::Evaluation { revisions } => {
if let Some(last) = revisions.last() {
last
} else {
return vec![];
}
}
};
let mut nested_goals = vec![];
self.candidates_recur(&mut candidates, &mut nested_goals, &last_eval_step.evaluation);
candidates
}
/// Returns the single candidate applicable for the current goal, if it exists.
///
/// Returns `None` if there are either no or multiple applicable candidates.
pub fn unique_applicable_candidate(&'a self) -> Option<InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx>> {
// FIXME(-Znext-solver): This does not handle impl candidates
// hidden by env candidates.
let mut candidates = self.candidates();
candidates.retain(|c| c.result().is_ok());
candidates.pop().filter(|_| candidates.is_empty())
}
fn new(
infcx: &'a InferCtxt<'tcx>,
depth: usize,
root: inspect::GoalEvaluation<TyCtxt<'tcx>>,
normalizes_to_term_hack: Option<NormalizesToTermHack<'tcx>>,
source: GoalSource,
) -> Self {
let inspect::GoalEvaluation { uncanonicalized_goal, kind, evaluation } = root;
let inspect::GoalEvaluationKind::Root { orig_values } = kind else { unreachable!() };
let result = evaluation.result.and_then(|ok| {
if let Some(term_hack) = normalizes_to_term_hack {
infcx
.probe(|_| term_hack.constrain(infcx, DUMMY_SP, uncanonicalized_goal.param_env))
.map(|certainty| ok.value.certainty.unify_with(certainty))
} else {
Ok(ok.value.certainty)
}
});
InspectGoal {
infcx,
depth,
orig_values,
goal: uncanonicalized_goal.fold_with(&mut EagerResolver::new(infcx)),
result,
evaluation_kind: evaluation.kind,
normalizes_to_term_hack,
source,
}
}
pub(crate) fn visit_with<V: ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx>>(&self, visitor: &mut V) -> V::Result {
if self.depth < visitor.config().max_depth {
try_visit!(visitor.visit_goal(self));
}
V::Result::output()
}
}
/// The public API to interact with proof trees.
pub trait ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx> {
type Result: VisitorResult = ();
fn span(&self) -> Span;
fn config(&self) -> InspectConfig {
InspectConfig { max_depth: 10 }
}
fn visit_goal(&mut self, goal: &InspectGoal<'_, 'tcx>) -> Self::Result;
}
#[extension(pub trait ProofTreeInferCtxtExt<'tcx>)]
impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
fn visit_proof_tree<V: ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx>>(
&self,
goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
visitor: &mut V,
) -> V::Result {
let (_, proof_tree) = self.evaluate_root_goal(goal, GenerateProofTree::Yes);
let proof_tree = proof_tree.unwrap();
visitor.visit_goal(&InspectGoal::new(self, 0, proof_tree, None, GoalSource::Misc))
}
}