## `RefCell<T>` and the Interior Mutability Pattern

Interior mutability is a design pattern in Rust for allowing you to mutate data even though there are immutable references to that data, which would normally be disallowed by the borrowing rules. The interior mutability pattern involves using `unsafe` code inside a data structure to bend Rust's usual rules around mutation and borrowing. We haven't yet covered unsafe code; we will in Chapter 19. The interior mutability pattern is used when you can ensure that the borrowing rules will be followed at runtime, even though the compiler can't ensure that. The `unsafe` code involved is then wrapped in a safe API, and the outer type is still immutable.

Let's explore this by looking at the `RefCell<T>` type that follows the interior mutability pattern.

### `RefCell<T>` has Interior Mutability

Unlike `Rc<T>`, the `RefCell<T>` type represents single ownership over the data that it holds. So, what makes `RefCell<T>` different than a type like `Box<T>`? Let's recall the borrowing rules we learned in Chapter 4:

1. At any given time, you can have either but not both of:

- One mutable reference.
- Any number of immutable references.

2. References must always be valid.

With references and `Box<T>`, the borrowing rules' invariants are enforced at compile time. With `RefCell<T>`, these invariants are enforced at runtime. With references, if you break these rules, you'll get a compiler error. With `RefCell<T>`, if you break these rules, you'll get a `panic!`.

Static analysis, like the Rust compiler performs, is inherently conservative. There are properties of code that are impossible to detect by analyzing the code: the most famous is the Halting Problem, which is out of scope of this book but an interesting topic to research if you're interested.

Because some analysis is impossible, the Rust compiler does not try to even guess if it can't be sure, so it's conservative and sometimes rejects correct programs that would not actually violate Rust's guarantees. Put another way, if Rust accepts an incorrect program, people would not be able to trust in the guarantees Rust makes. If Rust rejects a correct program, the programmer will be inconvenienced, but nothing catastrophic can occur. `RefCell<T>` is useful when you know that the borrowing rules are respected, but the compiler can't understand that that's true.

Similarly to `Rc<T>`, `RefCell<T>` is only for use in single-threaded scenarios. We'll talk about how to get the functionality of `RefCell<T>` in a multithreaded program in the next chapter on concurrency. For now, all you need to know is that if you try to use `RefCell<T>` in a multithreaded context, you'll get a compile time error.

With references, we use the `&` and `&mut` syntax to create references and mutable references, respectively. But with `RefCell<T>`, we use the `borrow` and `borrow_mut` methods, which are part of the safe API that `RefCell<T>` has. `borrow` returns the smart pointer type `Ref`, and `borrow_mut` returns the smart pointer type `RefMut`. These two types implement `Deref` so that we can treat them as if they're regular references. `Ref` and `RefMut` track the borrows dynamically, and their implementation of `Drop` releases the borrow dynamically.

Listing 15-14 shows what it looks like to use `RefCell<T>` with functions that borrow their parameters immutably and mutably. Note that the `data` variable is declared as immutable with `let data` rather than `let mut data`, yet `a_fn_that_mutably_borrows` is allowed to borrow the data mutably and make changes to the data!

Filename: src/main.rs

    use std::cell::RefCell;

    fn a_fn_that_immutably_borrows(a: &i32) {
        println!("a is {}", a);
    }

    fn a_fn_that_mutably_borrows(b: &mut i32) {
        *b += 1;
    }

    fn demo(r: &RefCell<i32>) {
        a_fn_that_immutably_borrows(&r.borrow());
        a_fn_that_mutably_borrows(&mut r.borrow_mut());
        a_fn_that_immutably_borrows(&r.borrow());
    }

    fn main() {
        let data = RefCell::new(5);
        demo(&data);
    }

Listing 15-14: Using `RefCell<T>`, `borrow`, and `borrow_mut`

This example prints:

    a is 5
    a is 6

In `main`, we've created a new `RefCell<T>` containing the value 5, and stored in the variable `data`, declared without the `mut` keyword. We then call the `demo` function with an immutable reference to `data`: as far as `main` is concerned, `data` is immutable!

In the `demo` function, we get an immutable reference to the value inside the `RefCell<T>` by calling the `borrow` method, and we call `a_fn_that_immutably_borrows` with that immutable reference. More interestingly, we can get a mutable reference to the value inside the `RefCell<T>` with the `borrow_mut` method, and the function `a_fn_that_mutably_borrows` is allowed to change the value. We can see that the next time we call `a_fn_that_immutably_borrows` that prints out the value, it's 6 instead of 5.

### Borrowing Rules are Checked at Runtime on `RefCell<T>`

Recall from Chapter 4 that because of the borrowing rules, this code using regular references that tries to create two mutable borrows in the same scope won't compile:

    let mut s = String::from("hello");

    let r1 = &mut s;
    let r2 = &mut s;

We'll get this compiler error:

    error[E0499]: cannot borrow `s` as mutable more than once at a time
     -->
      |
    5 |     let r1 = &mut s;
      |                   - first mutable borrow occurs here
    6 |     let r2 = &mut s;
      |                   ^ second mutable borrow occurs here
    7 | }
      | - first borrow ends here

In contrast, using `RefCell<T>` and calling `borrow_mut` twice in the same scope will compile, but it'll panic at runtime instead. This code:

    use std::cell::RefCell;

    fn main() {
        let s = RefCell::new(String::from("hello"));

        let r1 = s.borrow_mut();
        let r2 = s.borrow_mut();
    }

compiles but panics with the following error when we `cargo run`:

        Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.83 secs
         Running `target/debug/refcell`
    thread 'main' panicked at 'already borrowed: BorrowMutError',
    /stable-dist-rustc/build/src/libcore/result.rs:868
    note: Run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace.

This runtime `BorrowMutError` is similar to the compiler error: it says we've already borrowed `s` mutably once, so we're not allowed to borrow it again. We aren't getting around the borrowing rules, we're just choosing to have Rust enforce them at runtime instead of compile time. You could choose to use `RefCell<T>` everywhere all the time, but in addition to having to type `RefCell` a lot, you'd find out about possible problems later (possibly in production rather than during development). Also, checking the borrowing rules while your program is running has a performance penalty.

### Multiple Owners of Mutable Data by Combining `Rc<T>` and `RefCell<T>`

So why would we choose to make the tradeoffs that using `RefCell<T>` involves? Well, remember when we said that `Rc<T>` only lets you have an immutable reference to `T`? Given that `RefCell<T>` is immutable, but has interior mutability, we can combine `Rc<T>` and `RefCell<T>` to get a type that's both reference counted and mutable. Listing 15-15 shows an example of how to do that, again going back to our cons list from Listing 15-5. In this example, instead of storing `i32` values in the cons list, we'll be storing `Rc<RefCell<i32>>` values. We want to store that type so that we can have an owner of the value that's not part of the list (the multiple owners functionality that `Rc<T>` provides), and so we can mutate the inner `i32` value (the interior mutability functionality that `RefCell<T>` provides):

Filename: src/main.rs

    #[derive(Debug)]
    enum List {
        Cons(Rc<RefCell<i32>>, Rc<List>),
        Nil,
    }

    use List::{Cons, Nil};
    use std::rc::Rc;
    use std::cell::RefCell;

    fn main() {
        let value = Rc::new(RefCell::new(5));

        let a = Cons(value.clone(), Rc::new(Nil));
        let shared_list = Rc::new(a);

        let b = Cons(Rc::new(RefCell::new(6)), shared_list.clone());
        let c = Cons(Rc::new(RefCell::new(10)), shared_list.clone());

        *value.borrow_mut() += 10;

        println!("shared_list after = {:?}", shared_list);
        println!("b after = {:?}", b);
        println!("c after = {:?}", c);
    }

Listing 15-15: Using `Rc<RefCell<i32>>` to create a `List` that we can mutate

We're creating a value, which is an instance of `Rc<RefCell<i32>>`. We're storing it in a variable named `value` because we want to be able to access it directly later. Then we create a `List` in `a` that has a `Cons` variant that holds `value`, and `value` needs to be cloned since we want `value` to also have ownership in addition to `a`. Then we wrap `a` in an `Rc<T>` so that we can create lists `b` and `c` that start differently but both refer to `a`, similarly to what we did in Listing 15-12.

Once we have the lists in `shared_list`, `b`, and `c` created, then we add 10 to the 5 in `value` by dereferencing the `Rc<T>` and calling `borrow_mut` on the `RefCell`.

When we print out `shared_list`, `b`, and `c`, we can see that they all have the modified value of 15:

    shared_list after = Cons(RefCell { value: 15 }, Nil)
    b after = Cons(RefCell { value: 6 }, Cons(RefCell { value: 15 }, Nil))
    c after = Cons(RefCell { value: 10 }, Cons(RefCell { value: 15 }, Nil))

This is pretty neat! By using `RefCell<T>`, we can have an outwardly immutable `List`, but we can use the methods on `RefCell<T>` that provide access to its interior mutability to be able to modify our data when we need to. The runtime checks of the borrowing rules that `RefCell<T>` does protect us from data races, and we've decided that we want to trade a bit of speed for the flexibility in our data structures.

`RefCell<T>` is not the only standard library type that provides interior mutability. `Cell<T>` is similar but instead of giving references to the inner value like `RefCell<T>` does, the value is copied in and out of the `Cell<T>`. `Mutex<T>` offers interior mutability that is safe to use across threads, and we'll be discussing its use in the next chapter on concurrency. Check out the standard library docs for more details on the differences between these types.